high-performance liquid chromatography-based ion exchanged procedure tosho alc 2.2 (TOSHO Co Inc)
90
Structured Review
TOSHO Co Inc
high-performance liquid chromatography-based ion exchanged procedure tosho alc 2.2
High Performance Liquid Chromatography Based Ion Exchanged Procedure Tosho Alc 2.2, supplied by TOSHO Co Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/high-performance+liquid+chromatography-based+ion+exchanged+procedure+tosho+alc+2%2E2/high+performance+liquid+chromatography+based+ion+exchanged+procedure+tosho+alc+2+2/10__1002_slash_14651858__cd011469__pub2-2279-16-17
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
High Performance Liquid Chromatography Based Ion Exchanged Procedure Tosho Alc 2.2, supplied by TOSHO Co Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/high-performance+liquid+chromatography-based+ion+exchanged+procedure+tosho+alc+2%2E2/high+performance+liquid+chromatography+based+ion+exchanged+procedure+tosho+alc+2+2/10__1002_slash_14651858__cd011469__pub2-2279-16-17
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
high-performance liquid chromatography-based ion exchanged procedure tosho alc 2.2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
90/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
Control:Article Title: Psychological interventions for diabetes‐related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus Article Snippet: DRD and BP were reported as non‐significant without details Other bias Low risk Comment : right use of statistical analysis (linear mixed‐effect models) that adjust for a potential clustering effect Assessment of risk of bias in cluster‐randomised trials Recruitment bias: probably no Baseline imbalance: unclear, probably no "No other baseline patient variables differed significantly among the four study groups" Loss of clusters: unclear Incorrect analysis: no, linear mixed‐effect models were used Comparability with individually randomised trials /different types of clusters: yes Open in a separate window Quinn 2011 Methods Parallel randomised controlled trial; randomisation ratio 1:1 Participants Inclusion criteria : type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus, were over 18 years of age and had participated in a group education programme offered at the diabetes clinic Exclusion criteria : pregnancy, severe debilitating disease and cognitive deficit Diagnostic criteria : PAID was used to measure diabetes‐related distress; the Perceived Competence for Diabetes Scale (PCDS) was used to measure competence at carrying out the diabetes treatment regime; glycaemic control was assessed using HbA1c, which was measured by a high‐performance liquid chromatography‐based ion exchanged Article Title: Psychological interventions for diabetes‐related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus Article Snippet: Participants , Inclusion criteria : type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus, were over 18 years of age and had participated in a group education programme offered at the diabetes clinic Exclusion criteria : pregnancy, severe debilitating disease and cognitive deficit Diagnostic criteria : PAID was used to measure diabetes‐related distress; the Perceived Competence for Diabetes Scale (PCDS) was used to measure competence at carrying out the diabetes treatment regime; glycaemic control was assessed using Article Title: The effect of motivational interviewing on glycaemic control and perceived competence of diabetes self-management in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus after attending a group education programme: a randomised controlled trial. Article Snippet: Glycaemic control was assessed using HbA1c, which was measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography-based ion exchanged Article Title: Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus Article Snippet: Published by Article Title: Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus Article Snippet: Glycaemic control was assessed using Chromatography:Article Title: Psychological interventions for diabetes‐related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus Article Snippet: DRD and BP were reported as non‐significant without details Other bias Low risk Comment : right use of statistical analysis (linear mixed‐effect models) that adjust for a potential clustering effect Assessment of risk of bias in cluster‐randomised trials Recruitment bias: probably no Baseline imbalance: unclear, probably no "No other baseline patient variables differed significantly among the four study groups" Loss of clusters: unclear Incorrect analysis: no, linear mixed‐effect models were used Comparability with individually randomised trials /different types of clusters: yes Open in a separate window Quinn 2011 Methods Parallel randomised controlled trial; randomisation ratio 1:1 Participants Inclusion criteria : type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus, were over 18 years of age and had participated in a group education programme offered at the diabetes clinic Exclusion criteria : pregnancy, severe debilitating disease and cognitive deficit Diagnostic criteria : PAID was used to measure diabetes‐related distress; the Perceived Competence for Diabetes Scale (PCDS) was used to measure competence at carrying out the diabetes treatment regime; glycaemic control was assessed using HbA1c, which was measured by a high‐performance liquid chromatography‐based ion exchanged Article Title: Psychological interventions for diabetes‐related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus Article Snippet: Participants , Inclusion criteria : type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus, were over 18 years of age and had participated in a group education programme offered at the diabetes clinic Exclusion criteria : pregnancy, severe debilitating disease and cognitive deficit Diagnostic criteria : PAID was used to measure diabetes‐related distress; the Perceived Competence for Diabetes Scale (PCDS) was used to measure competence at carrying out the diabetes treatment regime; glycaemic control was assessed using Article Title: The effect of motivational interviewing on glycaemic control and perceived competence of diabetes self-management in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus after attending a group education programme: a randomised controlled trial. Article Snippet: Glycaemic control was assessed using HbA1c, which was measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography-based ion exchanged Article Title: Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus Article Snippet: Published by Article Title: Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus Article Snippet: Glycaemic control was assessed using Diagnostic Assay:Article Title: Psychological interventions for diabetes‐related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus Article Snippet: DRD and BP were reported as non‐significant without details Other bias Low risk Comment : right use of statistical analysis (linear mixed‐effect models) that adjust for a potential clustering effect Assessment of risk of bias in cluster‐randomised trials Recruitment bias: probably no Baseline imbalance: unclear, probably no "No other baseline patient variables differed significantly among the four study groups" Loss of clusters: unclear Incorrect analysis: no, linear mixed‐effect models were used Comparability with individually randomised trials /different types of clusters: yes Open in a separate window Quinn 2011 Methods Parallel randomised controlled trial; randomisation ratio 1:1 Participants Inclusion criteria : type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus, were over 18 years of age and had participated in a group education programme offered at the diabetes clinic Exclusion criteria : pregnancy, severe debilitating disease and cognitive deficit Diagnostic criteria : PAID was used to measure diabetes‐related distress; the Perceived Competence for Diabetes Scale (PCDS) was used to measure competence at carrying out the diabetes treatment regime; glycaemic control was assessed using HbA1c, which was measured by a high‐performance liquid chromatography‐based ion exchanged Article Title: Psychological interventions for diabetes‐related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus Article Snippet: Participants , Inclusion criteria : type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus, were over 18 years of age and had participated in a group education programme offered at the diabetes clinic Exclusion criteria : pregnancy, severe debilitating disease and cognitive deficit Diagnostic criteria : PAID was used to measure diabetes‐related distress; the Perceived Competence for Diabetes Scale (PCDS) was used to measure competence at carrying out the diabetes treatment regime; glycaemic control was assessed using Article Title: The effect of motivational interviewing on glycaemic control and perceived competence of diabetes self-management in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus after attending a group education programme: a randomised controlled trial. Article Snippet: Glycaemic control was assessed using HbA1c, which was measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography-based ion exchanged Article Title: Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus Article Snippet: Published by Article Title: Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus Article Snippet: Glycaemic control was assessed using |